2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

RationalWiki talk:2011 board of trustees election

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can we have official page for evaluating the nominees?[edit]

I don't know who is better; can we have a page that links from here, where we hear arguments for the nominees? I guess the page for complaints about administrators is presently the best place for character evaluations, but I want to know who will enact the most policies which I favour. (Please don't tell me they aren't supposed to do anything but pay bills; they are the rulers of the rationalwiki.org, and could legally amend the by-laws in any way they choose. Due to the cross examinations of a certain anarcho-librarian, they finally broke down and admitted it.) ~ Lumenos (talk) 19:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The candidates have been selected. Thus far all but ListenerX have responded to my request on their talkpage to come to the town hall and answer questions for the people. ~ Lumenos (talk) 04:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)