RationalWiki talk:Proposed best of RationalWiki

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District

Then make it worthy and bring it back :). tmtoulouse ^pester 17:38, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

That comment reads as such a wonderful non-sequitur... goatspeed! human^{be in} 23:34, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

No, I said it was the red one, not the blue one. tmtoulouse ^pester 23:37, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Damn, I spend all day fixing those! human^{be in} 23:42, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Next thing you know he will call them that. tmtoulouse ^pester 23:49, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Gene Expression

I agree its a good article, but is it best of rationalwiki? I am not sure, its a fairly straight forward encyclopedia article. It would be worth trying to find a hook or angle and turn it into something that meets are site mission/goals a little more clearly. tmtoulouse ^pester 17:38, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

Promotion

Not getting much feedback one way or another, I am inclined to promote these if there are no objections, since they all seem good to me and we need content in our best of...they can always be removed later as well if there are objections. tmtoulouse ^pester 16:45, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

When adding them, shouldn't they be deleted from both the project page and the talk page, unless there is substantive discussion to save? human^{be in} 18:15, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Yes. tmtoulouse ^pester 18:15, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

You want feedback? I absolutely hate your plan. There. Now you have feedback. Bohdan

That makes the plan instantly better. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 18:37, 30 August 2007 (CDT)