There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
For 2600:4040:5789:8400:3965:681B:965B:106E talk block log suppressed user contributions logs edit filter log vandal log
- 11:28, 19 June 2023 diff hist +106 Antiziganism Undo revision 2556491 by Spud (talk) yes it is - although I would not consider this "wiki" to actually be a wiki, rather it is a radical woke echo-chamber that dangerously passes off their dogma as rational. Anyway, regardless of it being neutral, this viewpoint isn't actually what a lot of gypsies think themselves. So it is simply inaccurate. Tag: Undo
- 11:26, 19 June 2023 diff hist -106 Antiziganism Undo revision 2556498 by 2600:4040:5789:8400:3965:681B:965B:106E (talk) Tag: Undo
- 11:25, 19 June 2023 diff hist +106 Antiziganism Undo revision 2556491 by Spud (talk) Yes it does - Also regardless of it being neutral, this viewpoint isn't actually what a lot of gypsies think themselves. So it is Tag: Undo
- 06:52, 19 June 2023 diff hist +106 Antiziganism reduced bias in article - editing it to provide a more neutral PoV