"William Lane Craig" article - logical fallacy
I saw you reverted my change to the Craig article. The argument that "looks like a logical fallacy" to you is in fact a valid application of modus tollens or "denying the consequent", not an application of the (fallacious) inference pattern affirming the consequent.
I'm not going to revert it or reply again about this. Leave the article in whatever state you like. (Sorry if it's bad form to bring this up here, I'm not familiar with wiki etiquette.)— Unsigned, by: 220.127.116.11 / talk / contribs
Please, see 
- If you think someone saying, "A fucking leaf", for 39 seconds is funny, then no. Spud (talk) 11:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)