Information icon.svg Consider taking the RationalWiki Community Survey 2017 or see the results.

User talk:Spud

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>

"William Lane Craig" article - logical fallacy[edit]

I saw you reverted my change to the Craig article. The argument that "looks like a logical fallacy" to you is in fact a valid application of modus tollens or "denying the consequent", not an application of the (fallacious) inference pattern affirming the consequent.

I'm not going to revert it or reply again about this. Leave the article in whatever state you like. (Sorry if it's bad form to bring this up here, I'm not familiar with wiki etiquette.)— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Persistent vandalism[edit]

Please, see [1]


Awesome Award[edit]

A close up of an awesome, amazing goat's face.

Awesome Award



Reason: being awesome

ClickerClock (talk) 13:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


Want to hear a joke? --Onacompass (talk) 11:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

If you think someone saying, "A fucking leaf", for 39 seconds is funny, then no. Spud (talk) 11:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
--Onacompass (talk) 22:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Don't patrol edits with ugly references[edit]

fix the references, than patrol. —ClickerClock (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)