User contributions
For 82.44.104.86 talk block log suppressed user contributions logs edit filter log vandal log
- 22:18, 28 March 2017 diff hist +185 User:GreatPerson
- 02:54, 28 March 2017 diff hist +54 Morality English improved. I wrote the original sentence and the meaning was changed so I was restoring it. Scientific consensus was brought up as esoteric philosophy =/= pseudoscience and so can't be dismissed out of hand the same way by mission statement
- 02:42, 28 March 2017 diff hist +22 Talk:Morality
- 02:42, 28 March 2017 diff hist +1,229 Talk:Morality →Moral skepticism is not baby eating: new section
- 02:31, 28 March 2017 diff hist +8 Morality There is no scientific consensus against the concept, there cannot be. Gut reaction to a an established philosophical school does not mean it is "crank", please don't undo this again unless you are to some extent familiar with the material.
- 02:17, 28 March 2017 diff hist -87 User talk:82.44.104.86 Blanked the page
- 02:14, 28 March 2017 diff hist +8 Morality Undo revision 1807306 by CheeseburgerFace (talk) Has a well established place in philosophy academia, philosophy is not science, fringe =/= crank
- 00:58, 27 March 2017 diff hist +8 Morality Undo revision 1807084 by Bongolian (talk) Without "to some" the section on moral Skepticism outright states it is incorrect which is unencylopedic