There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 00:50, 14 October 2014 diff hist +1 m Talk:Trans-exclusionary radical feminist →TERF edits highlight the need for more debunking
- 00:48, 14 October 2014 diff hist +340 Talk:Trans-exclusionary radical feminist →TERF edits highlight the need for more debunking
- 00:43, 14 October 2014 diff hist +301 Talk:Trans-exclusionary radical feminist →TERF edits highlight the need for more debunking
- 19:53, 13 October 2014 diff hist +98 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.
- 19:41, 13 October 2014 diff hist +1 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.
- 19:40, 13 October 2014 diff hist +554 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.
- 19:22, 13 October 2014 diff hist +4 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.
- 19:22, 13 October 2014 diff hist +26 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.
- 19:18, 13 October 2014 diff hist +508 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.
- 18:53, 13 October 2014 diff hist +498 User talk:David Gerard →Inquiry about edit reversion.: new section
- 16:56, 13 October 2014 diff hist -4 m Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Criticizing religious violence is not only fair game, but necessary.
- 16:52, 13 October 2014 diff hist +87 User talk:Scream!! →Thanks for the tip.: new section
- 16:47, 13 October 2014 diff hist 0 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Criticizing religious violence is not only fair game, but necessary.
- 16:46, 13 October 2014 diff hist -45 m Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Criticizing religious violence is not only fair game, but necessary.
- 06:29, 13 October 2014 diff hist +9 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.
- 06:23, 13 October 2014 diff hist +388 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.
- 06:11, 13 October 2014 diff hist +131 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.
- 06:09, 13 October 2014 diff hist +619 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.
- 06:01, 13 October 2014 diff hist +1 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.
- 05:58, 13 October 2014 diff hist +1,895 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.
- 04:22, 13 October 2014 diff hist +4,367 Debate:"Anti-theism" or "Why is Atheism not enough?" →Why going after religious violence is completely fair game.: new section