There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:09, 7 August 2020 diff hist +362 Talk:Bra →The cancer scare...
- 21:07, 7 August 2020 diff hist +593 Bra →Cancer scare: See discussion page. The Scientific American article cited above is only an opinion piece.
- 15:15, 7 August 2020 diff hist +50 Talk:Bra →The cancer scare...
- 14:59, 7 August 2020 diff hist +6,412 Talk:Bra →The cancer scare...
- 13:32, 6 August 2020 diff hist +1,120 User talk:Hastur/archive13 →Bra article needs more science, less dogma: new section
- 13:25, 6 August 2020 diff hist -14 m Bra "more sharply define" is incorrect. Breasts without bras have sharply defined outline. The bra merely alters breast shape to fit the shape of the bra.
- 13:22, 6 August 2020 diff hist +2,840 Bra This article, before this edit, is highly one-sided, especially in the section about breast cancer. If we are talking about science, then we cannot just dismiss the cancer link with a vacuous statement from the ACS, especially with other studies.
- 13:21, 6 August 2020 diff hist +1,062 N User talk:Out-of-the-box Created page with "The article on bras dismisses the bra-cancer link with an unsupported statement from the ACS, and with no discussion of the theory behind the book, Dressed to Kill, which is d..." current
- 14:35, 5 August 2020 diff hist +4,820 Bra Deleted editorialized opinion. Added references and further information about the bra-cancer theory.