User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:09, 7 August 2020 diff hist +362 Talk:Bra →The cancer scare...
- 21:07, 7 August 2020 diff hist +593 Bra →Cancer scare: See discussion page. The Scientific American article cited above is only an opinion piece.
- 15:15, 7 August 2020 diff hist +50 Talk:Bra →The cancer scare...
- 14:59, 7 August 2020 diff hist +6,412 Talk:Bra →The cancer scare...
- 13:32, 6 August 2020 diff hist +1,120 User talk:Hastur/archive13 →Bra article needs more science, less dogma: new section
- 13:25, 6 August 2020 diff hist -14 m Bra "more sharply define" is incorrect. Breasts without bras have sharply defined outline. The bra merely alters breast shape to fit the shape of the bra.
- 13:22, 6 August 2020 diff hist +2,840 Bra This article, before this edit, is highly one-sided, especially in the section about breast cancer. If we are talking about science, then we cannot just dismiss the cancer link with a vacuous statement from the ACS, especially with other studies.
- 13:21, 6 August 2020 diff hist +1,062 N User talk:Out-of-the-box Created page with "The article on bras dismisses the bra-cancer link with an unsupported statement from the ACS, and with no discussion of the theory behind the book, Dressed to Kill, which is d..." current
- 14:35, 5 August 2020 diff hist +4,820 Bra Deleted editorialized opinion. Added references and further information about the bra-cancer theory.