Talk:Albert Camus

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Is there a nudability notability requirement around here? I'm as much a Camuvian as the next guy, but I kind of wonder if we're putting the cart ahead of the horse giving him an article on a wiki that doesn't have one for--say--Shakespeare, Dickens, Keats, Kipling, Salinger or Sartre. I don't think the article's doing any harm, but it seems to exist mostly for a little bit of snarkiness. Jon in Iowa 20:45, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

Generally if a page exists it exists....no questions asked. If said page advocates racism it gets firebombed by the community and expunged. Otherwise it usually stays. CЯacke® 20:49, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
That's not really true. Pages get vaporized or funinized all the time. ThunderkatzHo! 20:50, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
An article on Sartre would be smarter, but Camus can do for now. ;) Chair tater (talk) 09:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)