There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Albert Camus
Is there a nudability notability requirement around here? I'm as much a Camuvian as the next guy, but I kind of wonder if we're putting the cart ahead of the horse giving him an article on a wiki that doesn't have one for--say--Shakespeare, Dickens, Keats, Kipling, Salinger or Sartre. I don't think the article's doing any harm, but it seems to exist mostly for a little bit of snarkiness. Jon in Iowa 20:45, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
- Generally if a page exists it exists....no questions asked. If said page advocates racism it gets firebombed by the community and expunged. Otherwise it usually stays. CЯacke® 20:49, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
- That's not really true. Pages get vaporized or funinized all the time. ThunderkatzHo! 20:50, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
- An article on Sartre would be smarter, but Camus can do for now. ;) Chair tater (talk) 09:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- That's not really true. Pages get vaporized or funinized all the time. ThunderkatzHo! 20:50, 10 June 2008 (EDT)