There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Anarcho-nihilism
Comment[edit]
No sources, wildly innacurate and speculative. Such things here are just clearly wrong, like the repeated use of the world 'ideology' which nobody who studies nihilist strains of anarchism would call the tendancy. for similar reasons the phrase 'post-left ideology' is also laughable, post-left is a collection of critiques, not an ideology. I do not have the time to do this but will leave this talk up for a week before requesting an AfD on this page. 80.43.112.26 (talk) 13:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
This one is a massive stub[edit]
Someone should get it fixed. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 13:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is anarcho-nihilism a real thing people believe in, or just an insult? It sounds fun. --Annanoon (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Just a question[edit]
Why do we have a "significantly problematic" template up on a deleted article?-Flandres (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Because no one ever bothered to remove it. It took a few days for someone to add the category, people often forget about the talk pages of deleted articles. Christopher (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)