2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Answers Research Journal volume 5

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon creationism.svg

This Creationism related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png

This simulation crap[edit]

Have they yet explained a) why they expect the ocean to be warmer after the floods, and b) nothing else has changed geographically from the modern US? - π 04:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

I have little patience for them (these are skimmed), but I think the answer is a) ? b) of course it has. It's a big f-ing flood. steriletalk 07:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
(And now I have to go read them more carefully, dammit!) steriletalk 07:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

subheads[edit]

The TOC is all messed up without the subheadings. === if you have to, but can we keep some subheadingness there? sterilesporadic heavy hitter 13:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)