Talk:B4B:Heliocentrism is an Atheist Doctrine

Psycheout, you might wanna ease back a little. We at Rationalwiki try to keep an open mind, but we have to draw the line somewhere, we've already had this problem with racist editors, and I'll put it clearly: we do not wish wish to be affiliated with fascism, bigotry and the very pseudoscience we are trying to debunk. If you are thinking about promoting B4B ideas on this website you've come to the wrong place. In future times you might want to consult with other editors first, when writing articles. MiddleMan 07:22, 14 July 2007 (CDT)

Well, gee, I'm so sorry. How am I promoting anything? What is the specific problem? Don't worry, I won't try and make your wiki more useful or more readable or more interesting if you'd rather I didn't. Are you accusing me of vandalism? I did a fair amount of work and think it improved the original bloated article. Feel free to make any suggestions or list your complaints on my talk page. --Psycheout 10:18, 14 July 2007 (CDT)

BTW, the content of the Rebuttal section was a placeholder with what I though was some humerous filler. If RW people find an essay notable, it would seem they'd want to rebut, react or otherwise debunk it. That was the point of the section. It seems a little lazy to just quote bits and not say why or what's wrong with them. IMHO. --Psycheout 10:24, 14 July 2007 (CDT)

MM, not sure if Psycheout deserves your rebuffs, but a diff illustrating your concerns would sure help. Heart♥Gold^{Preach to somebody not in the choir} 23:45, 14 July 2007 (CDT)