Talk:Baba Vanga

References

As of now, two sources that act as references that qualifies research has been added; those are from the Washington Post and VICE Broadly. Any more? -- Bryan See (talk) 10:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

People who claim to be clairvoyants are not reliable sources of information, especially on this website. Stop using this article as a source. CowHouse (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Why not? I'm sure that the article says: "Baba Vanga is very right-wing and reactionary and xenophobic. [...] Could it be that Vanga, beloved baba of Eastern Europe, really is a racist?"

She is a very right-wing and reactionary and xenophobic crone and really is a rabid racist, and also an authoritarian wingnuttery.

@CowHouse -- Bryan See (talk) 05:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

The entire article concerns an interview with a supposed clairvoyant (in other words, a charlatan). Do you think clairvoyants actually have the power to communicate with dead people or accurately predict the future? If not, I have no idea why you think such a source is worth using. If yes, I don't think you will enjoy RationalWiki since we're more interested in debunking such claims. CowHouse (talk) 12:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

@CowHouse to answer this question "Do you think clairvoyants actually have the power to communicate with dead people or accurately predict the future?": No. Absolutely no. -- Bryan See (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Three new sources might be considered:

http://www.baba-vanga.com/

http://fondacia-vanga.com/

http://vanga.eu/

-- Bryan See (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)