There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Baba Vanga
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
References[edit]
As of now, two sources that act as references that qualifies research has been added; those are from the Washington Post and VICE Broadly. Any more? -- Bryan See (talk) 10:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- People who claim to be clairvoyants are not reliable sources of information, especially on this website. Stop using this article as a source. CowHouse (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Why not? I'm sure that the article says: "Baba Vanga is very right-wing and reactionary and xenophobic. [...] Could it be that Vanga, beloved baba of Eastern Europe, really is a racist?"
- She is a very right-wing and reactionary and xenophobic crone and really is a rabid racist, and also an authoritarian wingnuttery.
- @CowHouse -- Bryan See (talk) 05:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- The entire article concerns an interview with a supposed clairvoyant (in other words, a charlatan). Do you think clairvoyants actually have the power to communicate with dead people or accurately predict the future? If not, I have no idea why you think such a source is worth using. If yes, I don't think you will enjoy RationalWiki since we're more interested in debunking such claims. CowHouse (talk) 12:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Three new sources might be considered: