Talk:Belief in belief
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This Religion related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information. |
| ||
|
| ||||
Is this the opposite of Fallacy fallacy? Totnesmartin (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. I was boozing last night and I've lost the ability to parse double negatives. --
Ask me about our bamboo 11:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should do phobophobia (hating the haters), Conservapedia:Conservapedia (what CP says about itself) and argumentum ad argumentum? (winning the argument by going on about it for so long that everyone else gets ground down into agreeing - happens a lot on WP). Totnesmartin (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I like those ideas. The phobophobia thing is pretty common. I suppose extremism invites extreme responses. Argumentum ad argumentum seems a pretty popular Internet meme. I see it a lot in discussion forums, and we've had it here as well - specifically in the never-ending abortion debates. Well, the latter would be true if people weren't stubborn. --Ask me about our kitten 12:08, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- I like those ideas. The phobophobia thing is pretty common. I suppose extremism invites extreme responses. Argumentum ad argumentum seems a pretty popular Internet meme. I see it a lot in discussion forums, and we've had it here as well - specifically in the never-ending abortion debates. Well, the latter would be true if people weren't stubborn. --
- Perhaps we should do phobophobia (hating the haters), Conservapedia:Conservapedia (what CP says about itself) and argumentum ad argumentum? (winning the argument by going on about it for so long that everyone else gets ground down into agreeing - happens a lot on WP). Totnesmartin (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)