Talk:Daniel Kawczynski

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Could someone with more wiki-skills than I Wikify this article for me, please? Ta! Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 18:46, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Done! D-Notice 18:48, 4 June 2008 (EDT)


The start of the transcript says "8:25" and after the interview finishes, the next presenter says it's "8:37". The commentary on the page says that the interview listed 2 minutes.

If the interview lasted 2 min then either it started at 8:25 and finished at 8:27, or started 8:35 and finished 8:37. Which is correct? [I'm assuming it didn't last 12 mins...] D-Notice 19:04, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

This desperately needs a link to the source. Which would make it a lot easier to answer the difficult maths question. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:39, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
Duh, my bad. The interview was from 0825 to 0827 (2 mins). I'll fish out the linkylinky to the actual interview. Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 03:10, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks in advance for the "footnote" thingie, M. Hiver. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:17, 5 June 2008 (EDT)


This really needs a link to the source! Do I have to google it myself? (because otherwise, this is unsubstantiated buggles) ħumanUser talk:Human 04:12, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Done D-Notice 05:36, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks! ħumanUser talk:Human 14:43, 5 June 2008 (EDT)


Proof? I used to live in Shrewsbury, and he was generally seen as a bit of a joke, but I never heard anything about his being a bible-basher. Can't find any evidence through a certain web search engine either.

For that matter the guy seems really quite moderate, judging by this. He's a bit nasty on the immigration front judging by the transcript in the RW article, but I don't think that's quite enough for him to be tagged as a 'loon'.Webbtje (talk) 16:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)