There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Dictionary
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deletion discussion[edit]
This page has been templated for deletion, by User:Kels.
Essay:Argumentum ad dictionarium seems to address a more relevant, or at least a more typical subject for the site. My inclination would be to move that essay to this name, and keep it. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 05:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem like the worst idea. Although even better, take the essay out of essay space and spruce it up as an actual Argumentum ad dictionarium article and redirect this page there since the article would be about the logical fallacy rather than the book. --Kels (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)