Talk:Drunken Peasants

shitty ad

This article reads like a shitty ad for a shitty podcast. Is this actually an article that should be kept? - David Gerard (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

The podcast itself isn't shitty at all, but I guess the article is (although it really doesn't read like an ad). I don't know, I'm not that good at writing Sierra Nav (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

It reads like fancruft. And anything involving TheAmazingAtheist isn't something we should be promoting. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 18:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Than you should remove his article and any mention of him here, cause that could be seen as "promoting", too.--Kugelschreiber (talk) 18:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Only if you're being obtuse and/or inane - David Gerard (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Then what's the difference? Please enlighten me.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 20:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 20:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

That's an article, this is an ad. Also, "then" not "than" (twice). Please stop playing dumb - David Gerard (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

The article doesn't seem to overly praise the show like ad material normally does. Probably not having enough snark and criticism makes it looks like an ad compared to other site?

P.S.: And how do you come to the conclusion, that I "play dumb"?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 20:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 20:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to promote it. I just saw it under the "to do list", so I decided to create an article on it. Sierra Nav (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)