Talk:Dumb Argument
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrammarCommie, you can add to this page if you want. I don't mind. Not at all. Go ahead. Just don't delete it.
You can add to this page all you want to increase it from just being a stub. — Unsigned, by: Logicnsuch / talk / contribs
- That's not how stubs work. You're supposed to put effort yourself, not create stubs and expect others to do the work for you. --It's-a me,
🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 03:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Logicnsuch RationalWiki:Drafts. But first, is it really worth an article? Judging by what you started with, I suspect it'd get deleted anyway. —Kazitor
03:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I expanded it a little. Now just leave it alone, or you can improve it if you want.Logicnsuch (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Look, this article doesn't seem appropriate for main space. Its vague title isn't useful perhaps only for cheap links, but we already have other articles including the one on male bovine waste and logical fallacy and more specific kinds of bad arguments. If you want to keep a list of bad arguments, this would seem more appropriate for essayspace. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 06:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Look, this article doesn't seem appropriate for main space. Its vague title isn't useful perhaps only for cheap links, but we already have other articles including the one on male bovine waste and logical fallacy and more specific kinds of bad arguments. If you want to keep a list of bad arguments, this would seem more appropriate for essayspace. --It's-a me,
- Ok, I expanded it a little. Now just leave it alone, or you can improve it if you want.Logicnsuch (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Logicnsuch RationalWiki:Drafts. But first, is it really worth an article? Judging by what you started with, I suspect it'd get deleted anyway. —Kazitor
