Talk:Golden age

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg

This History related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

I see that we now have nostalgia and Good old days. I'd say that this one has the best title and the others should redirect to this.--BobSpring is sprung! 13:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 14:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
yes, then we can talk about how good the other two were. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Sir, I salute your grasp of this subject! --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 14:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I think they make a nice little clustrifuck of snarticles and would miss any two of them if they were gone. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
At least merge "good old days" with this one. There's probably a case for keeping nostalgia separate, if it can be about the concept & psychology of nostalgia, & appeals to nostalgia in politics etc., & this one can be about common examples of perceived "golden ages". ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I think the ga and god are different enough to stay distinct. Ga can be thousands or millions (!) of years ago, but god implies living people waxing nostalgic about a time they remember, or at least think they do. As I said, I think they are a sweet little triumclustate. Tome to make sure they all "see also" each other... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
But GA & GOD both cite the age of chivalry as an example. . . ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 02:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Then one of them must be wrong. I'd say god. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Also GA says: "In its most reduced form, it can be seen in an inclination to think fondly of "the good ol' days","--BobSpring is sprung! 07:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
But you are a known hobosexual. So your opinion here counts for twelve. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
A very profound outsight.--BobSpring is sprung! 07:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)