There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Hope4Cancer
Great work, but...[edit]
...though sourced to excellency, the article itself is still short, because it has too little actual handwritten analysis.
Also, the page seriously has too many external links — couldn't some be used as sources in <ref> tags instead?
We ought to stop adding sources and external links for now, and focus on analyzing the sources that are already in place. Thoughts? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)