Talk:Lubos motl

Do we really need an article on this guy? Seems like just an ad for his blog, which isn't very good (just read a couple entries). Sounds like this guy might be better off on CP. Also, if we keep it we should probably capitalize his last name. ollïegrïnd 08:57, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

I'd say no. I don't think anyone has really heard of him, and this was put up by the same guy who made the anti-semitic changes to Wolfowitz and Chickenhawk. Thunderkatz 09:04, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, that's who I found it. It looks like this was User:NeoNazi when he forgot to sign in. ollïegrïnd 09:05, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

Agreed on all points. It took him three edits to add a link to his pet article, global warming wager, at pascal's wager. No one else "knows" that article even exists. As far as this one, we need an AFD process. Perhaps until we have one, we copy this discussion (with the page title not linked) to a page called RationalWiki:AFD and delete the article? human^{be in} 12:50, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

We're a young project. Im actually for deleting the damn thing and letting someone recreate it if it's so damned important. IMHO only.--PalMD^-Goatspeed! 12:52, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

AFD

This article has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is above, and when an answer is resolved, please copy the discussion to RationalWiki:AFD#Lubos motl and archive it under "/deleted" or "/kept" there. human^{be in} 12:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

Speedy delete as spam, unless you're just doing a process trial run. Heart♥Gold^{Preach to somebody not in the choir} 21:19, 14 July 2007 (CDT)

I'm pretty annoyed that I keep agreeing with HG. I'm gonna kill it if there are no objections soon.--PalMD^-Goatspeed! 21:20, 14 July 2007 (CDT)