RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3500Goal: $3500


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

In what way could goats possibly be relevant? John Childermass (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Goats are always relevant. Pippa (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Really? Strange. I take it the goat is the equivalent here of Wikipe-tan? I can find no Rational-tan.John Childermass (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

That is not a response, but is humorous none the less. John Childermass (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC)