There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Matt Walsh
Bronze[edit]
I think this article should be a bronze ←§ Edward the eight (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Never trumper.[edit]
Given that Matt Walsh supported Evan McMullin in the 2016 election, I think that should be mentioned in the main article as a cautionary tale to proof that yes, never trumpers can be just as bigoted, if not more so than any trumpist. — Unsigned, by: 2601:281:d880:ded0:c9c8:2da3:b186:4167 / talk / contribs
Anti-asexual[edit]
Nowhere obvious to insert this without creating a whole new section for it.
- "Matt Walsh is Clueless About Asexuality", which reacts to Walsh's "Stop Glorifying Asexuality"
- "Matt Walsh, love and misconceptions about asexuality", and the follow-up
- "Why Do People Hate Asexuals?" mentions, in passing, him and Ben Shapiro being anti-asexual
- "Yes, Christian Fascism's Anti-LGBTQ Hate Extends to Asexual People, Too"
Perhaps more, I haven't really done a deep look for sources about it.
Walsh's anti-ace video clearly bothered the community, I saw forum posts about it as well for instance. Chillpilled (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is false[edit]
Most of the claims made in this article either:
Lack citations need better citations are quoted out of context
Sologuy (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Give a couple examples? I've edited throughout this article quite a few times and not sure what you're talking about. Chillpilled (talk) 01:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

What Is A Man?[edit]
Of course Matt's bullshit movie has been already blasted far and wide (my personal favourite comes from another RW), but I was reading some classic in the philosophy of the mind and I was struck by this question.
It's not just thoroughly defining what a female man is (I hope the feminist god may forgive me for the wording) to be hard: even just describing what mentally makes "an object" a man is comparable to rocket science. — Unsigned, by: Mirh / talk / contribs