2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Talk:Moose

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Do we really need this, even in "fun"? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:30, 2 August 2008 (EDT)

No. DogP 22:33, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
I agree. Love the graphic though. Weirdbeard 06:58, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
the picture's nice too. Totnesmartin 07:13, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
It is needed for the Margaret Thatcher article. Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 07:21, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
Do we need that article to say "she is also a complete moose", and if so, is a link to moose necessary? Should we also create articles about penguins, Kettering General Hospital, the Paris-Dakar rally, a military plane and the Mummy Returns? After all, the article mentions them, what makes moose so special? Totnesmartin 07:38, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
Cos dey is hugly. And yeah, I can do an article about KGH :) Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 11:59, 3 August 2008 (EDT)