Talk:Nature

Yes, we need it. Obviously right now it's a sub-stub, but maybe we can add more? (It was a red link, so I wrote the awesome stub) ħuman 23:18, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

Should we fork this between Nature the journal and just plan old nature? tmtoulouse ^frustrate 23:40, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

Could we fold major journals like Nature and Science into a single article? tmtoulouse ^frustrate 23:40, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

It should have been called "Nature (magazine)" yes. Anyone give a shit enough to do the work? ħuman 00:03, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Eh, it is not hard work. I think Nature (journal) is better. tmtoulouse ^frustrate 02:01, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Yes, that makes sense. Glad you like my "fork" templatey thing. I detest all work and hope that my suggestions will inspire younger, more energetic contributors to do the "heavy lifting". ħuman 02:10, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Yes I like the fork template, in fact it is enshrined in stubbot who will ignore pages with it, and I set stubbot back in the day to replace competing templates with fork. tmtoulouse ^frustrate 02:13, 19 August 2008 (EDT)