Information icon.svg Nominations and Campaigning for the 2022 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now closed.

The election booth is now open!


From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Yes, we need it. Obviously right now it's a sub-stub, but maybe we can add more? (It was a red link, so I wrote the awesome stub) ħumanUser talk:Human 23:18, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

Should we fork this between Nature the journal and just plan old nature? tmtoulouse persecute 23:40, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
Could we fold major journals like Nature and Science into a single article? tmtoulouse persecute 23:40, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
It should have been called "Nature (magazine)" yes. Anyone give a shit enough to do the work? ħumanUser talk:Human 00:03, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
Eh, it is not hard work. I think Nature (journal) is better. tmtoulouse persecute 02:01, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
Yes, that makes sense. Glad you like my "fork" templatey thing. I detest all work and hope that my suggestions will inspire younger, more energetic contributors to do the "heavy lifting". ħumanUser talk:Human 02:10, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
Yes I like the fork template, in fact it is enshrined in stubbot who will ignore pages with it, and I set stubbot back in the day to replace competing templates with fork. tmtoulouse persecute 02:13, 19 August 2008 (EDT)