Talk:No Answers in Genesis

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Is this page notable enough to have an article about it? I visited the site and it seems to be quite old (it mentions the new millennium drawing nearer.) It has some okay rebuttals to creationist nonsense, but so do millions of sites around the world. I propose that this site be deleted- on account of it being of little importance, and not being edited in the last three years.Several ingredients (talk) 21:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Notability is not really anything we particularly care about nor grounds for deletion, that said there is so little content actually in this article that it could simply become an EL to Answers in Genesis or folded into another article. Or expanded into a real article if someone looks at it and wants to. Tmtoulouse (talk) 21:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
An "EL"? Sorry that I don't know the wiki-vocabulary very well, but does that mean re-direct (or Electronic Link)? I'm a little perplexed how I might "fold" an article as well... Could someone explain to me what this means in clear terms?Francis.gif Several ingredients (talk) 05:44, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
I think "EL" stands for "external link." (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The "new millennium drawing nearer" bit was a Carl Sagan quote. Evil Reptilian Overlord (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)