2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can't this just be merged into Noah's Ark or Global flood if nobody's expanding it? ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:16, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Woodmorappe's Response[edit]

Does anyone know where there is an answer to Woodmorappe's supposed 'refutation' of the cited review? Eyeonicr (talk) 08:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Merge[edit]

Nobody will mind if sometime in the future this article is mysteriously redirected to Caring for the animals in Noah's ark, will they? A proper discussion of the book would simply duplicate material that should go there. Peter Monomorium antarcticum 03:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I won't, no. TyAnnoy 03:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Not now - it wouldn't be very mysterious if it happened now, would it? Peter Monomorium antarcticum 03:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
That was not what the edit comment was about, but no, it would not. TyAnnoy 03:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)