There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study
Can't this just be merged into Noah's Ark or Global flood if nobody's expanding it? ŴêâŝêîôîďMethinks it is a Weasel 18:16, 8 February 2009 (EST)
Woodmorappe's Response[edit]
Does anyone know where there is an answer to Woodmorappe's supposed 'refutation' of the cited review? Eyeonicr (talk) 08:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Merge[edit]
Nobody will mind if sometime in the future this article is mysteriously redirected to Caring for the animals in Noah's ark, will they? A proper discussion of the book would simply duplicate material that should go there. Peter Monomorium antarcticum 03:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)