2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:On the spot fallacy

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Inspiration[edit]

Originally from Forum:Logical Fallacy help. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 03:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Would the quote work better on the Nirvana Fallacy page?[edit]

Think about it. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Sure! Though don't expect it to fit perfectly. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 13:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Ad Hom?[edit]

It's an ad hom, right? It doesn't say that it is in the article. NiciesMan (talk) 9:28 PM, April 15, 2021 (UTC)

I wouldn’t say so, no. Christopher (talk) 21:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)