2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:One world religion

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon religion.svg

This Religion related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

"Fundamentally different"[edit]

I'm trying to think of a rephrasing for this, because it's a miscommunication, and I don't quite know what to say. Even extraordinarily similar religions, like Anglicism and Catholicism are never going to merge because... there's too much natural emphasis on identity? Obscure doctrinal differences are all that separate a number of religions, and it's not "fundamentally different" but instead something else. Can someone please help me find the words for what I mean here? Ikanreed (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)