| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Talk:Palaeocene
Can this be made more RW-friendly - eg which Palaeocene beasties are shown in CreationHolidayWorldParks? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
What "beasties", like Mentoclaenodon or Carpolestes? I`m not sure that the Palaeocene gets coverage outside the scientific community (e.g. CNN, Fox, or Creationists), except for a few rare instances like Titanoboa. Or, are you suggesting I rewrite the article? I would like to keep it to the pure science, no creationist rebuttals and refutations in the article please.--185.17.93.142 (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)