There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Penis enlargement
'Them as promote the methods' should be made to advertise using themselves as demonstrations - otherwise they are 'all mouth and no trousers.' 212.85.6.26 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Circumcision?[edit]
Circumcision. Just sayin'. Probably one of the most-used PE thingamajigs out there, though I can't cite any statistics or list any other popular thingamajigs. Nullahnung (talk) 07:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Huh, couldn't find much of a relation with penis enlargement and circumcision on google. I could have sworn that it was one of the things people like to talk about when it comes to bigger penis size. At least I've heard it mentioned that way in real life. Of course I'd need a web source to provide a citation. What does anyone else here think? Nullahnung (talk) 07:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
it's a fallacy[edit]
I'm looking for a an appropriate point to add "it's a fallacy". Geddit?--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 18:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Stretchers do work[edit]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20102448/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08083.x — Unsigned, by: 109.201.133.22 / talk / contribs