Talk:Person

The only thing we can really do is turn this into a discussion of a when a fetus achieves personhood. In its current state, this is pointless and should be vaporized or funinized. Thunderkatz^Ho! 15:57, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Any better now? 18:15, 15 September 2008 (EDT) Totnesmartin

Much. Thank ye kindly. Thunderkatz^Ho! 19:10, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, good job on making it even wierder. It's getting up there with some of the most insane stuff on this website... Armondikov 14:57, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

What is the weirdest serious article here, I wonder? Totnesmartin 15:18, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Which is the one that is just a page of stub templates? That's slightly surreal viewing. Armondikov 15:20, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

This one? It's a satire of Ed Poor's (I think) CP "contributions", and the talk page is lovely as well. Totnesmartin 15:27, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

monkeys uncle

Is teh typo intentional?--{{SUBST:User:WaitingforGodot/sig2/sig}} 13:31, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

probably not. Feel free to correct minor errors (and indeed major ones!) Totnesmartin 13:35, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Personhood woo link

...is a 404 for me Totnesmartin 13:41, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

"Ethical persons"

This section doesn't actually attempt to address the arguments used by animal rights advocates. A carte blanche dismissal is not a valuable argument. Carthage (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

That section is utter shit, as a mere statement and a counter statement without reasoning, as you said. It needs improved or removed. Justarandomliberal (talk) 02:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)