There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Person
The only thing we can really do is turn this into a discussion of a when a fetus achieves personhood. In its current state, this is pointless and should be vaporized or funinized. ThunderkatzHo! 15:57, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
- Any better now? 18:15, 15 September 2008 (EDT) Totnesmartin
- Much. Thank ye kindly. ThunderkatzHo! 19:10, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yeah, good job on making it even wierder. It's getting up there with some of the most insane stuff on this website... Armondikov 14:57, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- What is the weirdest serious article here, I wonder? Totnesmartin 15:18, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Which is the one that is just a page of stub templates? That's slightly surreal viewing. Armondikov 15:20, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- This one? It's a satire of Ed Poor's (I think) CP "contributions", and the talk page is lovely as well. Totnesmartin 15:27, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Which is the one that is just a page of stub templates? That's slightly surreal viewing. Armondikov 15:20, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- What is the weirdest serious article here, I wonder? Totnesmartin 15:18, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yeah, good job on making it even wierder. It's getting up there with some of the most insane stuff on this website... Armondikov 14:57, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Much. Thank ye kindly. ThunderkatzHo! 19:10, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
monkeys uncle[edit]
Is teh typo intentional?--{{SUBST:User:WaitingforGodot/sig2/sig}} 13:31, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- probably not. Feel free to correct minor errors (and indeed major ones!) Totnesmartin 13:35, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
Personhood woo link[edit]
...is a 404 for me Totnesmartin 13:41, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
"Ethical persons"[edit]
This section doesn't actually attempt to address the arguments used by animal rights advocates. A carte blanche dismissal is not a valuable argument. Carthage (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- That section is utter shit, as a mere statement and a counter statement without reasoning, as you said. It needs improved or removed. Justarandomliberal (talk) 02:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)