2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $10064.65Goal: $10000

Talk:Perverted Justice

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


This whole article should be burnt to the ground[edit]

Sneering in tone, without any sense of objectivity (I know we aren't objective at RW but this is far beyond our usual tone). It is an angry rant. It's awful. Acei9 03:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

What's the obsession with deleting controversial pages lately as if they, along with their talk pages, weren't already thoroughly archived on multiple archive sites (which they are) 212.102.36.251 (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I mean, there's very very few articles on this wiki. The article has been here since you registered. How are you a wiki member for 16+ years and are just like now "oh wow this is such a horrible article that needs to go". 212.102.36.251 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
My length of service at RW has no bearing on how fucking awful this article is. It is essay at best. And has it been 16 years? Amazing...Acei9 08:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)