RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2835Goal: $5000

Talk:Post hoc, ergo propter hoc

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


This page has a "needs expansion" tag, but what specifically more does it need? Why this is a fallacy? What? HoorayForSodomy (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Actually I think this one should be merged with Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Oh, absolutely. Good call. I don't know how to merge, but I'm for this! HoorayForSodomy (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


Some content from http://evolutionwiki.org/wiki/Post_Hoc_Ergo_Propter_Hoc Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 20:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)