Talk:Post hoc, ergo propter hoc

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This page has a "needs expansion" tag, but what specifically more does it need? Why this is a fallacy? What? HoorayForSodomy (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Actually I think this one should be merged with Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Oh, absolutely. Good call. I don't know how to merge, but I'm for this! HoorayForSodomy (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


Some content from FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 20:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)