There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Pseudoastronomy
Scottish 'Not Proven' verdict[edit]
Where would the 'unknown unknowns' theories fall - 'The universe is big, there are stars like the Sun, and planets, so life has emerged elsewhere - they just have not developed suitable means of interstellar travel and also found The Earth', 'somewhere in the outer reaches of the Solar System is a body larger than the dwarf planets we know about, but it does nothing significant' and suchlike, and the theory is compatible with known science. Anna Livia (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)