There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Radfem Hub
The post on manboobz only quotes inoffensive content on Radfem Hub. The writer tells us "But I have spent some time going through these files myself in a completely random manner, which is evidently what AgentOrange expects everyone who downloads the files to do. To be perfectly honest, I haven’t spent that much time on this. I’ve really been quite busy with other things. But I have spent some time. More than twenty minutes, anyway." This is a pretty lame excuse for not simply admitting that, at least this once, the MRAs might just have a point. FTSD apparently suffered no trouble in pulling up offensive content, so I find it hard to believe he couldn't. They should simply get it out-yes, there's a reason the feminazi stereotype exists. No, it doesn't make MRAs or any other anti-feminists correct. There, it's done. Ideologues of all stripes want to score points, it seems, and can't admit an inch to The Enemy, even for the sake of honesty. Mcc1789 (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Talk about hatred. This mockery of an entry only reinforces the point that skeptics are way out of their depth when it comes to serious topics like ethics and politics. At least pretend to care about the facts. FrancoisTremblay (talk)