Talk:Radfem Hub

The post on manboobz only quotes inoffensive content on Radfem Hub. The writer tells us "But I have spent some time going through these files myself in a completely random manner, which is evidently what AgentOrange expects everyone who downloads the files to do. To be perfectly honest, I haven’t spent that much time on this. I’ve really been quite busy with other things. But I have spent some time. More than twenty minutes, anyway." This is a pretty lame excuse for not simply admitting that, at least this once, the MRAs might just have a point. FTSD apparently suffered no trouble in pulling up offensive content, so I find it hard to believe he couldn't. They should simply get it out-yes, there's a reason the feminazi stereotype exists. No, it doesn't make MRAs or any other anti-feminists correct. There, it's done. Ideologues of all stripes want to score points, it seems, and can't admit an inch to The Enemy, even for the sake of honesty. Mcc1789 (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk about hatred. This mockery of an entry only reinforces the point that skeptics are way out of their depth when it comes to serious topics like ethics and politics. At least pretend to care about the facts. FrancoisTremblay (talk)

It's a wiki (wi·ki /ˈwikē/ Noun" A Web site developed collaboratively by a community of users, allowing any user to add and edit content.) Scream!! (talk) 12:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)