2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $2973.89Goal: $10000

Talk:Relativist fallacy

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attribution[edit]

Some content from http://evolutionwiki.org/wiki/Relativism Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 02:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Um[edit]

Are you sure you got this bit right? Wikipedia gives a markedly different definition of relativist fallacy. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 02:28, 16 November 42015 AQD (UTC)

I think both of the definitions of the fallacy are trying to say the same thing -- I've added that to the article and recreated wronger than wrong. FuzzyCatPotato of the Bad Volkswagens (talk/stalk) 18:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)