Talk:Robert Lazar/Archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 14 May 2022. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

United Nuclear and Lazar’s contravention of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act[edit]

The WP section on United Nuclear has some good dirt: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar#United_Nuclear Scarlet A.pnggnostic 12:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Element 115[edit]

Bob Lazar's claim of Element 115 wasn't contradicted by the synthesis of Element 115 on Earth. The Element 115 that was artificially created was unstable, having a half-life of much less than 1 second, while the material he worked with was stable. This is a difference in isotopes. Look into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability for more information. — Unsigned, by: 107.184.32.17 / talk 07:13, 8 December 2018

I know the claims towards the support of the theory are anecdotal at best but as shown in the 2018 documentary, completely stable 115 is hypothetically possible to create. The science community just doesn't know how, or what it'd do. Should stable 115 be created and its effects studied it will easily make or break his claims. 75.134.45.1 (talk) 13:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Are you suggesting there is a "pseudoscience community" that is better equipped to create stable forms of elements 109-118? Snort. CogitoNotStirred (via telepathy) (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
To answer the OP, his claim that 115 couldn't be synthesized were contradicted by it being synthesized. Its claims that it is stable are contradicted (at least theoretically) by the theories that say it won't have stable isotopes. --Annanoon (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)