Information icon.svg

Nominations for the RationalMedia Foundation 2020 board of trustees election are now open!

User talk:GrammarCommie

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>

An apology[edit]

I didn't say or imply that you were either dishonest or a conspiracy theorist. I was, and I am claiming the argument that the activities of a group of youtubers afford some sort of gateway process leading to the alt-right is ill-conceived and scientifically unsustainable. There is nothing Nazi-like about any of the central figures. I would also claim that to attempt to maintain such a hypothesis would seem to me to be of rhetorical value only. I am willing to ignore my own reservations on this subject should it become necessary. Close analysis however, is not a product of democracy. I suppose I ought to state my genuine opinions. To refer to them as talking points might imply to some readers that I cannot back up my claims. I can, to the point where the controversy becomes ambiguous. I prefer to be friends rather than adversaries.

A word about Dave Rubin. He is not what I would refer to as an intellectual. His personal idol is Larry King. I take it as given that he is right of center, has overloaded his podcasts with right-wingers, but also that he has interviewed a number of the so-called IDW. He is a frontman. He is an MC. He has served that function with IDW people like Harris, Douglas Murray, and Jordan Peterson. Sometimes it seems to me that some people want to frame this wiki's POV as "us and them." That is not my personal POV. For me there just are not that many bad people. I confess to being an optimist. It's a lot easier, I admit, to just mark someone as a Nazi sympathizer, and leave it at that, than it is to editorialize on their entire opus. I am not saying that you are doing or ever have done that. However, I do get the impression that some people prefer it that way. Ariel31459 (talk) 21:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

@Ariel31459 I accept your apologies and I will admit that there are those on the left who seem to think that being left and supporting something other than capitalism makes one "good". I of course, given my habit of trying to be skeptical about even my own "side" disagree. I do however maintain that some on the right, such as the IDW have been trying to normalize Fascist rhetoric and ideas, something that I see getting overlooked all too often. In a nutshell, it's the Bell Curve fiasco all over again, and I wish that those in the center would actually push back against these things. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting my regrets. For me fascism is a form of regulation, usually governmental, always authoritarian and based on some kind of nationalism. The Japanese and the Italians also had fascist periods. You can argue that Trump and the republicans look like fascists. I would probably agree. In my opinion, intellectuals do not seem to fall into those lines, and I don't think many, if any, of the Americans are Trump defenders. In the 20th century, many intellectuals have been communist sympathizers (until Stalin's non-aggression pact anyway). No one of note was a Nazi sympathizer.Ariel31459 (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Ariel31459 Err... I can bring up many (then) respected Eugenics intellectuals who were not only nazi sympathizers but active collaborators in some cases. And Fascism doesn't really work like that. It's a highly flexible form of ethno-nationalism (usually white, though that can be changed) which is extremely opportunistic in it's methods of seizing power. Election or coup, it doesn't matter which to them. I actually know of a video essay based on several books written on the subject. I can link it here if you want. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 23:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Famous American intellectuals? I'd like to see that link. I don't think there are many Americans in that list None of note listed on Wikipedia anyway. Certainly no famous American intellectuals. Scientists are not typically intellectuals. Bad scientists, even less so. I think that fascism really works like that. I don't see that it is a useful category for classifying bad ideas. So many ideas are bad that have nothing to do with fascism. Any old bad idea was bad long before the Nazis came around. What was bad about the Nazis was how they treated people. Right now, North Korea, China, Iran and other non-European countries could be loosely described as under fascism after the classic model. As a psychological note, Europeans and Americans like to think of themselves and their adversaries as historically great, and that even their demons are rivals of the devil Himself. Ariel31459 (talk) 00:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Again, Fascism doesn't work like that. Your definition is too broad, and seems use Fascism as a synonym for authoritarianism, which is a slightly different beast. Here's the video essay (yes, it's an essay in video format, complete with sources) laying out its deffinition of fascism. It will take me a while to compile the list of eugenicists that cross pollinated with Nazi Germany. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
A fascist state has a number of qualities that are typical. First, it is presided over by an authoritarian autocrat, as is China, opposed to democracy and liberalism. Secondly, it is highly militaristic and nationalistic, like China. Thirdly, the rule of economy is divided among party leaders who are proxies for feudal nobility, while the people are subordinated to service to the state. There are a variety of other unpleasant possible features such as racial identity ( see China), but these three are generally enough to call a state fascist.Ariel31459 (talk) 23:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
@Ariel31459 Why do you do this to me? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Treasonous communist terrorist[edit]

This david gerrard guy sounds pretty good. Maybe we could get him to come to our wiki. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 15:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Recent Revision on Far-right page[edit]

Would you mind clarifying exactly why you reverted it? It didn't seem that far off the mark to me. RoninMacbeth (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@RoninMacbeth It was made by a user of dubious credibility. This is the same user who made a thread on my talkpage complaining that I killed their hate/troll article on Boomers and claimed they were "alt-left". ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Perhaps. But is the information itself inaccurate? RoninMacbeth (talk) 01:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
@RoninMacbeth Maybe? None of it is sourced but some it sounds like stuff I've heard from better sources? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I'll check it, but do you mind if I restore it provisionally? RoninMacbeth (talk) 01:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
@RoninMacbeth If you're sure. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Excuse Me[edit]

Why was my edit reversed? It was not a vandalism. -- (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

I never said it was. In fact, the reversion occurred because the previous version was better. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Melanin Theory[edit]

Why was the edits reverted? Was there something I did incorrectly. — Unsigned, by: Ankhael / talk / contribs

Citation for Behe quote[edit] — Unsigned, by: / talk,_Interview Read his position on Common descent — Unsigned, by: / talk
On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
I read it, he's waffling, he's still a shit source, you still cited a denialist site, the quote is still shit. Anything else? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok, then block me. I have reverted your reversion of my reversion of your reversion of my edit. (talk) 01:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
If you're just going to edit war, I don't need to block you. I can just lock the page and force you to explain yourself or not get your way. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC) is run by Gert Korthof. He was a contributor to the anticreationist book Why Intelligent Design Fails. He is a proponent of Extended Synthesis. (talk) 01:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
So he's a denialist and a moron. You don't seem to be good at arguing your side. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 02:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Maybe the the quote serves no purpose. But it is genuine. You caan check by borrowing a pdf of The Edge of Evolution from (talk)
Even if it is genuine, it is from a a person who a has crappy views on the relevant subject. Would you quote a pedophile's views on child rearing? Or might there be an inherent conflict of interest there? If someone talks out of their ass on the subject of physics a lot, is it a good idea to quote them on the subject of physics? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 02:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Do you even know why quotes exist in articles? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 02:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
I give up. 06:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC) — Unsigned, by: / talk

Censorship on Talk page[edit]

I need to understand why you're attempting to do this, please.Einlanzer (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

@Einlanzer I'm not censoring you. Anyone at any time can click the little "show" icon and see what you wrote. It was just stupid and irrelevent, and derailed an ongoing debate. Further, the last time I was accused of censoring someone it was because I wouldn't let a fan of an antisemitic libertarian whitewash said subject's article. I don't know, maybe learn how words work before using them. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


you traitor, you had the bo winegard wikipedia article deleted. R2D279247959 (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm going to be honest, I completely forgot about that until now. Glad all that information you fed me went to good use. As for traitor... You connot betray that which you never declared loyality to, as that's sort of a prerequisite. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Following up on IDW[edit]

Just to let you know, I am listening to the first video on Rubin now.

I came across this video by Robert Wright and Michael Brooks (Brooks is a Leninist?), both critics of IDW, that you might find interesting. They seem intelligent enough. I don't agree with some of it, but that's intellectualism for you.Ariel31459 (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

First take on Part I: no complaints. I agree with this guy and subscribed to his channel (although "Timbah on Toast" sounds a little silly). He seems more of an Eric Weinstein fan than I am.Ariel31459 (talk) 14:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

First take on Part 2: Good evidence that Rubin is exploiting interest in right-wing ideas when he has right-wing guests. Criticism of Rubin with the one good guy, Stephen Fry, was not entirely convincing. I have to say that I have never listened to those interviews, because I expected to hear lies from those particular people. And also, I don't follow Rubin or try to watch interviews of anyone I don't already think is worthwhile. Ariel31459 (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

@Ariel31459 Well, I'm glad to hear we are both wary of these sorts of bad faith actors. What were your thoughts on part 3? I was originally waiting for your impressions on that before I replied. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 10:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Glad to see you are still keeping an eye on things here. I just now finished reviewing part 3 of the Rubin Show critique by Timbah. Some points immediately come to mind that I consolidate into a few paragraphs.

The Rubin guests Timbah chose to highlight struck me as extremely obnoxious: Tommy Robinson, Tommy Sotomyer, Stefan Molyneux, and Candice Owens were cherry picked to high-light Rubin's interview technique with right-wingers. It would however, be a statistical blunder to assume that Rubin's guests are typically as bad as these four persons. It would have been better to briefly review a few bad ones like Molyneux, and then follow-up with an inventory of a few dozen guests with the same or similar reputations. Instead, the viewer must assume that the miscreants Timbah is focusing on are typical in some real way. Maybe they are, I don't really follow Rubin. My evidence has been skewed by the Rubin videos I have viewed of people who Timbah does not regard in the same way as the four villains mentioned so prominently such as Eric Weinstein, whom Timbah has not criticized. Indeed, there is over one half hour spent on describing Molyneux's unscrupulous performances, which really tried my patience. By focusing long and hard on a few really, really bad guests, we can conclude that Rubin is lazy, does not do his homework, and is probably intellectually incapable of performing on a competent level.

But can we infer anything sinister about Rubin's motives? Clearly Timbah implies that is a very real possibility that the unwary viewer is being proselytized. We are told that there is a danger that unsuspecting youth may be attracted to Rubin's generally cheerful and good-natured demeanor and find themselves transported toward the likes of Stefan Molyneau. This is the portal theory, but not really well argued, as if it were tacked onto the end of the video as an afterthought. Rubin is averse to what is vulgarly known as sjw points of view, and is shown to say so. Conspicuous in his absence is Jordan Peterson, who only appears in images, sometimes along side Molyneux. I went to review some of Molyneux's interview of Peterson after seeing that. In this interview segment, Peterson responds to Molyneux's claim that there are great differences in IQ between races and sexes by saying, there are only nominal differences between the sexes, and there is a large difference between Ashkenazi Jews (higher) and White Europeans (lower). Stefan didn't seem too happy to hear that and from what I can tell, is no longer a fan of JP. One might hope that some of Molyneux's regular viewers feel differently about Molyneux as well.

So, to conclude, I give this video high marks as one side of a debate, though the argument of the debate remains unstated. It could have been, Resolved, David Rubin is a political opportunist only interested in enlarging his audience for financial gain by exploiting right-wingers on YouTube. He appears to be more charming than intellectually talented, though he is, like Peterson, discomforted by activist-left politics.Ariel31459 (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

@Ariel31459 I felt Timbah gave Weinstein and Fry a fair shake, considering some of the controversies surrounding their views. I do agree that he should have tackled the Peterson angle more, again, given the associated controversies. It's possible they got cut due to total runtime, but I can't say for certain. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Community Standards[edit]

You wanna weigh in? It's up for vote now. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 16:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@DuceMoosolini I read the recent debates and voted. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I just want to make sure that every major user gets a chance to vote on this change. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 16:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

A debate challenge[edit]

The article Why RationalWiki is dying appears to be very upsetting to you. You seem desperate to not to let others see it.

Second, you seemed very eager to want to debate me yesterday. So let's have us debate about whether RationalWiki is dying or not and whether or not the underlying reasons I gave for its dying were legitimate.

You do admit that a website losing a considerable amount of traffic and global market share while massively losing inbound links shows the public is losing interest in it, don't you? And you do admit there is data showing this taking place, don't you?GiuocoPiano (talk) 17:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

No. You were too scared to debate, so we aren't doing that. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Undoing posts[edit]

However despicable he is you should not do so, I believe it is against site policy.--Mercian (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

when has it been site policy to provide a platform for human dogshit? AMassiveGay (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
@Mercian If Ken can post more than a few sentences without it going off topic or into ad hom attacks, it can stay. Otherwise, I will treat him as I would a small child. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
RationalWiki is capricious and authoritarian. Your new rules prove this.
I had no idea that some factual posts of mine would cause RationalWiki to adopt authoritarian rules. This reminds me of something that Vox Day said, "...I will not destroy the Hugos, I will make them do it."[1]GiuocoPiano (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Ken, LiberalTears undid my edits fact checking you, Karajou blocked me against your community standards, and you hid the relevant logs and lied to me. Shut up, mkay? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You'll probably succeed in driving him off, but it's not because you're right. It's because you're a bully making up rules as you go along. You have no basis for unilaterally dictating that you have the authority to edit anyone else's comments. The community standards are crystal clear that there are very few reasons to delete posts, and you being a tough guy isn't one of them. Please just stop. 2601:249:8D80:3194:FD13:2CB5:66E6:9C2A (talk) 22:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Explain how I'm a bully. Explain how forcing Ken to stay on topic and not ramble like a lobotomy patient is so wrong. Explain why I should give a rat's ass about preserving a lying hypocrite's ad hom attacks. Go on, I'm listening. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You're a bully because you mistakenly continue insisting on your right to violate one of the few explicit policies RW has in a manner calculated to harass and assert your dominance over another editor. Forcing Ken to "stay on topic" isn't your prerogative. It just isn't. If you think it is, show us the rule that permits it. You don't need to give a rat's ass about anything Ken says. You do need to follow the Community Standards relating to talk page posts. 2601:249:8D80:3194:FD13:2CB5:66E6:9C2A (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
None of the rationales you keep bringing up allows you to remove others' comments. Can you just knock it off already? 2601:249:8D80:3194:FD13:2CB5:66E6:9C2A (talk) 22:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
"You're a bully because you mistakenly continue insisting on your right to violate one of the few explicit policies RW has in a manner calculated to harass and assert your dominance over another editor." Dear lord! What have you been huffing? Can I have some? I don't know if you've noticed but not all of Ken's posts have been deleted or edited, just the ones consisting of Ad Hom attacks and tangents. Why? Because he's being a little shit, and I'm keeping him in line. If you don't like it, there are Mods, bring this up with them. Oh, and given the kind of shit Ken gets up to on CP, where he hides the edit logs (which I haven't done), where he acts like a spoiled brat because no one there will house train him, yeah, I think I'm a better class of scum. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You're arguing against a word generator, GC. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 00:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────😂Bongolian (talk) 00:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Or as the Ken quote generator would say:
Gentlemen! I will neuter your precious Wii, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be revolving over Operation domino, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Gentlemen, behold!

Given your great penchant to hide you head in the sand and ignore reality - your comments in regards to homeschooling are very foolish. As far as homosexuality and foolishness, you haven't shown that it is common for skeptics to claim that Paul or Peter did not write such and such New Testament book but they were written by others who assumed their name. In fact, by some time in the next quarter, it is likely Liberal Panty-waists will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Illinois is gathering steam!!! I might have been talking with a prominent blogger who assures me it's likely that something big or small may or may not be happening in the near or distant future or past!


KD Buffalo
Bongolian (talk) 02:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Way are you removing my edits[edit]

all 6 of those actors are conservative or Republican? — Unsigned, by: / talk

Because you're edit warring with Bongolian. Take it to the talkpage and ping them. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
What does the word Bongolian mean? — Unsigned, by: / talk
On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. They're the user who reverted your edits before I did. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Teddy — Unsigned, by: / talk
Before you redo my edit. I talked with Bongolian, I just need to put links in and thats it. OK we talked about it. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs
I know, I've read your conversation as I reformat your comments. By the way, indent and sign. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 02:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Well, I can’t find the definition of Bongolian on Google, but I found a music artist named The Bongolian. His full name is Nasser Bouzida. According to Google, he is in the band "Big Boss Man", a funky music band formed in 1998. 2001:56A:774D:8F00:E8AE:ACF5:866C:8F1E (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I always thought he was from the Democratic Republic of Bongo
--Hastur! (talk) 23:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Your behavior[edit]

I think you’re fine. I’ve had to stop you from being heavy handed in removing talk page comments, but that’s only been like twice or so. Just know that from my perspective you don’t have anything to feel bad about and I’ll vote in your favor in a potential coop case. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 17:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

@DuceMoosolini Though I appreciate the sentiment I want to wait and see what Nutty brings to the Coop before people start declaring sides. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
unless nutty has a miraculous gift at writing coop cases I think it's safe to say that it's not going to get anywhere. EK (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Since Mussolini already said they would vote against the coop case, I'll make sure to declare that I will vote in favor of it. — Godless Raven 🌹 Heretic 09:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
@Godless Raven Dearest Raven, I knew exactly how you'd vote before you told me. Of course you'd vote to desysop me and/or ban me, it's what you do. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 12:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Go back[edit]

to RatWiki Support Chat, Em's requesting you. Oxyaena Harass 16:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

No. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Pi block has happened to other 2001 thingy[edit]

A Pi block is a block encountered and expires 314159 seconds...away. Another 2001 starting IP address thingy user has been blocked. That block is a Pi block. Why you did that?? 2001:56A:774D:8F00:B418:EEF1:1622:BD79 (talk) 18:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

What? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I meant this: "A Pi block’s a block that expires 314159 seconds (or 3.6 days). This user got a Pi block for the reason "Mindless generic vandalism". 2001:56A:774D:8F00:B418:EEF1:1622:BD79 (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Are you the same user? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Nope. The user I’m talking about cannot create an account, cannot edit his talk page, and the block filter is anonymous users only. Conveniently, it said that blocks avoid editing every page except the talk page. In this case, the case also avoided the user’s talk page, which means that YOU blocked that user for vandalism (on all pages of RW with user’s talk page). — Unsigned, by: 2001:56A:774D:8F00:B418:EEF1:1622:BD79 / talk
Two major points. A) Yes I did. And B), try not to reuse the same IP range when lying. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Lies??? Not lies!! Do you know why you blocked that user for 314159 seconds??? 2001:56A:774D:8F00:B418:EEF1:1622:BD79 (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I forgot to sign here. 2001:56A:774D:8F00:B418:EEF1:1622:BD79 (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

I have a website for you![edit]

I need you to come to my website here! (I’m an anonymous user, and I do a CAPTCHA every time I edit. Linking to external sites have an extra CAPTCHA, too. But I have already one!). 2001:56A:774D:8F00:E8AE:ACF5:866C:8F1E (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

What? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Oh shit is it Logic boy? Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 22:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
No idea. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
GrammarCommie, and DuceMoosolini, can you see this? Just search in the bar, look at how many pages (the "[number] pages" but they are content pages or articles), look at one article named Gremener, and do you want to make a Fandom account or no? Or do you have a Fandom account? But the Fictpedia Wiki admin has extra things to do. 2001:56A:774D:8F00:E8AE:ACF5:866C:8F1E (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

I promised[edit]

... and I delivered. EK (talk) 13:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@EK As will I. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
I assume that's over (?) so u can resume whatever you were doing :) EK (talk) 15:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring solves nothing[edit]

As I said to Godless Raven. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 21:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@LeftyGreenMario I cannot hold a conversation with those who lack the ability to hear. Furthermore, the draft says it's free for anyone to edit. So I'm editing out the shitty bits. I left the antisemitism thing in, I just added a template to hide it until it looked less like an argument between children. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


Why do you keep reverting talk page edits for no reason? There aren’t any slurs or threats, so there shouldn’t be any reason to suppress other users’ comments. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 21:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@DuceMoosolini I was seeking advice from LGM in her capacity as a Mod to seek a way to resolve the dispute. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
No, you blocked me and EK repeatedly. Why are you lying? It's in the logs. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 21:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
but GC, you reverted my complaint about you on LGMs talk page. EK (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

GC: Can you provide some details to your objections to what the other editors are doing? I would like to help if I can.Ariel31459 (talk) 23:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@Ariel31459 It's mainly that my attempts at discussion have been ignored, or shouted down, and when I edit on this topic, to remove content that I have repeatedly explained was low quality, in articles and in drafts that say "anyone can edit", they are reverted. This may not be "RadicalWiki", and in some ways I am glad it is not, but it should not be "RavenWiki" either. But please, tell me what to do. I beg of you. I have asked of others, and been attacked. I have stated my unease, and been attacked. If you have some insight that I do not, please enlighten me, for I am near my wit's end. All of my attempts critique Raven's edits concerning anarchism have been met with accusations of bad faith. I have considered leaving the wiki, due to the stress, and Raven has responded with unprovoked bile. I cannot speak with those whose ears are as if stone! I cannot! It is not possible! ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Are you okay?[edit]

I can't contact you through DM. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 22:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I hope you come back[edit]

No need to stay retired for good. ShabiDOO 22:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I also hope to see your full return GC. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 22:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
No. I do not use those templates lightly. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
The fate of Trotsky, he presumes. HairlessCat (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
So, he wants to flee to Mexico, and then get assassinated by a Soviet Agent? Thunderclapper (talk) 16:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
RationalWiki is communist, so yes, his time is coming. HairlessCat (talk) 20:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Small lesson for today[edit]

Stay off my talkpage. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
You don't own your talkpage. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 22:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Don't harass me. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ey. Stop. GR, trying to do a "taste of your own medicine" is not recommended at all. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 22:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
@GR There was nothing to "distance themselves from" in the first place. Oxyaena Harass 14:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Ok, you're wrong. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 16:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Raven owns up and apologizes to GC for making false charges against him. Repeatedly.[edit]


Talk page comments[edit]

You are repeatly removing other peoples talk page comments, for example mine, and Ravens, from mods talk pages, your own talk page etc. This is against site policy as you are well aware because you have had others blocked for it. Please don't do it ok. EK (talk) 17:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Next time this happens it will be a depromotion and a 9h block. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
this right here is genuine harassment. well done. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
As we all remember, GR got so much support when he tried to promote GC last time.-Flandres (talk) 17:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
You think everybody will cover up his ass forever? — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:43, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
over you? yes AMassiveGay (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlike others who hide their plans, you are open about it. Thank you for confessing to bad behavior. ;) — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
you asked a question you got an answer. hows that bad behaviour? actually dont bother answering, i'm sure gc doesnt want to prolong your presence his talk page. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── deleting talk page comments is against the rules. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Also, GC's talkpage isnt "his" talk page. He doesnt own it. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
But you can archive threads on yours just for displeasing you. Self awareness is not GR's strong suit, hmhmhm...-Flandres (talk) 17:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Is archiving against the rules? @FlandresGodless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
No, but when we all point out you archive threads that just started because you can't handle them you would go on about how your talk page is inviolable.-Flandres (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
You should've stopped at "no", because everything you said after is irrelevant. I don't violate the rules, GC does and you're a bootlicker who covers up the crimes. 'nuff said. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
pretty sure you can still delete vandalism or harassment, which at this point it, your continued posting here counts as. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
if GC deletes it, there will be consequences. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 17:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
It was relevant to stifling debate which is what is going on here. Also, you need to learn this is a mobocracy. The mob is sovereign, not the rules, and if the mob consensus is the rules need to be violated in this instance then it is perfectly OK.-Flandres (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── That's fine, the mob can be wrong sometimes. If the mob wants to defend child porn being posted here, you would defend it and I wouldn't. That's the logic you're defending here. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 18:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

That's more common on Wikipedia, we have only had that a few times here actually. >.< EK (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
But could it still happen here?-Flandres (talk) 18:06, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, and if GC did it, you would defend it. @FlandresGodless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 18:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I mean in theory yes, in practice it would probably be oversighted out of process by someone and hushed up, which is basically what happened last time. The person in question did not iirc get banned until months later. EK (talk) 18:09, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
LOL and I thought I was being hyperbolic. So someone actually posted child porn here and didn't get banned?Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 18:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Wait, what? Who posted CP? Thunderclapper (talk) 18:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
So, GR, when did you stop beating your wife?Soundwave106 (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── It was EK who stated it, not me. I am just asking. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 18:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Ah, JAQing off, I see. Soundwave106 (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes. — Godless Raven SDAPOe logo.svg talkstalkwalkbalk 🌹 Flag of Europe.svg 18:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


The section above was a simple warning, not an invitation for a heated debate over how breaking the site rules is actually ok. Shut up and do something more productive. EK (talk) 18:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stay[edit]

There are countless of lurker people like me who appreciate your work. Dogeatsdog (talk) 04:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline; if you accept, you may wish to campaign. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 14:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)


Still recovering from those burns i was given — Unsigned, by: TheFonz / talk / contribs


Not really trollish behaviour, as no-ones even has given me a word of welcome I just decided to do it my self, that has to be legal, right? TheFonz (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

It's 8:30 in the morning, I've only just finished coffee, and I'm in a bad mood. Don't fuck around with me. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Is that a threat? Also its 2:46 in the afternoon here. TheFonz (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
No, it's a warning. You're acting like troll, quit it. I don't really care if you stay or not, but I do want you to stop acting like a troll. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Fucking hell your harsh, well i could say I dont care about any of you because I've never met you, but I dont rub it in because I'm not a dick (feel free to verify this). But i dont want to leave on a bad note so sorry? TheFonz (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
This isn't harsh. This is me giving advice through a bad mood. Stay or go, that's up to you. But messing with templates and fighting over trivial crap doesn't make a good impression. Talk to people, work out why they do what they do, try to communicate. You might also want to read some of the pages about the site and its community. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the links, sorry — Unsigned, by: TheFonz / talk / contribs
Like I said, I'm in a bad mood. That doesn't mean I can't give advice. And I'm sorry if it seemed I was trying to bite your head off. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm always in a bad mood after losing anything or (more often) made to look like an idiot. :) TheFonz (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)