Talk:Scientific revolution

On the recent reversion, I'd say that David was right to switch the navbar to philosophy of science. Any reason why we shouldn't go with his objection? i.e. is it a classification problem or more an issue with changes of this nature being made to large groups of articles? Concernedresident ^{omg!!! ponies!!!} 10:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Nice that we are using the talk page. I think this is more "science" than "philosophy of science", but I could be persuaded. Of course, David does as David desires, so, meh, whatever, let David have his morning of reworking the wiki. ħuman 10:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

i.e., it's another "Human is in a pissy mood so will revert whoever he's pissy with" day - David Gerard (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Silence, wretch. Get back to breaking his wiki. I'm thinking it's more philosophy because it's not so much describing scientific processes - more how those processes came about. Concernedresident ^{omg!!! ponies!!!} 14:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. Reverted - David Gerard (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Scientific revolution != Enlightentment

I will try to rewrite some of this later to make the periodization match up better. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)