RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3900Goal: $6000

Talk:Secular humanism

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon atheism.svg

This Atheism related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.



It's a bit less stubby now, but maybe this article should be merged with the one on humanism in general. It's an important concept, and we could have a more detailed article that details the history of humanism and gives some information about the distinctions between classical humanism as an educational ideal and the modern philosophical concepts, both the secular and religious variants. Röstigraben (talk) 10:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Merging it would be a good idea indeed, after all, secular humanism is simply a subset of humanism in general. Lichy (talk) 14:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


I disagree, secular humanism need not be capitalized. Just like rationalism or empiricism aren't. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)