There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
It's a bit less stubby now, but maybe this article should be merged with the one on humanism in general. It's an important concept, and we could have a more detailed article that details the history of humanism and gives some information about the distinctions between classical humanism as an educational ideal and the modern philosophical concepts, both the secular and religious variants. Röstigraben (talk) 10:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I disagree, secular humanism need not be capitalized. Just like rationalism or empiricism aren't. ħuman 03:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)