There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Species
Question[edit]
If creationists accept microevolution, the whole creation-evolution debate comes down to whether the earth is thousands or billions of years old.If the earth is 6,000 years old, then there wouldn't be enough time for evolution to occur.However,if the earth is 5 billion years old, evolution must happen, because microevolution would have enough time to make new species.--Thedoctor80 (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think that to a creationist "microevolution" only allows changes within the species, not the creation of a new species. So they can evolve up to a point but not beyond where they can no longer successfully mate with the original.
ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 18:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Asexual species?[edit]
How does one define "species" when those organisms are reproduced through asexual means? [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 23:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)