There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Could we, possibly, create a pseudo-skeptics or fake/pretend skeptics category to put this guy into? In could do it now, but I just want opinions. — Unsigned, by: LimpWrist / talk / contribs 20:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- How many people would that category hold? If it's just him, it won't be very useful. -- Nx / talk 21:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Should we add that DDT has not in fact been totally banned? It is permitted for use for disease prevention in some areas, though its use is still controversial. Also, from what I have read, DDT does have some advantages over pesticides in indoor residual spraying, so a total ban might still not be totally justified. — Unsigned, by: Imarcuson / talk / contribs Now signed by Imarcuson (talk) 06:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)