RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3383Goal: $5000

Talk:Technobabble

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Well done. HeartGold tx 20:46, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Thank you :) humanbe in 21:03, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Just to geek-note, flux capacitor was "Back to the Future" not Trek.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 15:43, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
The mention certainly started out that way. Someone must have added the Star trek note without making it obvious that BTTF was not a ST ep. or movie. humanbe in 18:52, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
You would think a bunch of geeks could get it right.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 18:57, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
No, I wouldn't. I'd expect them to know, but to do a lousy job of writing about it. Either because they think "everyone knows" or because they're Inglisch gremmer skilz are wurs than there tiping. humanbe in 19:03, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

Would new Turing test-passing computers spout technobabble as they become sentient? (This explains most of the 'error messages' of uncooperative current computers.) 212.85.6.26 (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)