Talk:Technobabble

Well done. Heart♥Gold ^tx 20:46, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Thank you :) human^{be in} 21:03, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Just to geek-note, flux capacitor was "Back to the Future" not Trek.--PalMD^-Goatspeed! 15:43, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

The mention certainly started out that way. Someone must have added the Star trek note without making it obvious that BTTF was not a ST ep. or movie. human^{be in} 18:52, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

You would think a bunch of geeks could get it right.--PalMD^-Goatspeed! 18:57, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

No, I wouldn't. I'd expect them to know, but to do a lousy job of writing about it. Either because they think "everyone knows" or because they're Inglisch gremmer skilz are wurs than there tiping. human^{be in} 19:03, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

Would new Turing test-passing computers spout technobabble as they become sentient? (This explains most of the 'error messages' of uncooperative current computers.) 212.85.6.26 (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Duplicate material

Doesn't this article contain duplicate material from Sciencey?--Deli-delibirda! (talk) 09:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)