There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:TheBlaze
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Can we vaporize?En attendant Godot 21:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- And they say I'm delete happy! :D I think he/she is genuinely trying, but doesn't know how the markup works, but I'm a strong believer in Assume Good Faith. No opinion. Тytalk 21:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- I just hate stubs, even if you ARE trying. ;-) p-foster had his thing with red "!", i have my thing with stubs. but fine. I just like to vaporize things. if we used standard wiki type "delete page" it would not be so much fun. I bet if i went to a star Trek wiki, I could get to "foton torpedo" the pages.
En attendant Godot 21:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- I just hate stubs, even if you ARE trying. ;-) p-foster had his thing with red "!", i have my thing with stubs. but fine. I just like to vaporize things. if we used standard wiki type "delete page" it would not be so much fun. I bet if i went to a star Trek wiki, I could get to "foton torpedo" the pages.
SpongeBob?[edit]
Aside from the mention of GB, the dots are too randomly sprinkled for me to connect. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- I get that the spongebob Global Warming21:23, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
En attendant Godot
- Yes, it does say that, but how is The Blaze involved? Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- NO freaking idea. I just corrected it. thinking maybe it has some use somewhere.... but not really here. cause far as I can tell, his website didn't make a big deal about it. but i've already said i'm not a fan of the page at all. square pants or not.
En attendant Godot 21:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- NO freaking idea. I just corrected it. thinking maybe it has some use somewhere.... but not really here. cause far as I can tell, his website didn't make a big deal about it. but i've already said i'm not a fan of the page at all. square pants or not.
- Yes, it does say that, but how is The Blaze involved? Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)