|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:The LessWrong dictionary
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is terrible[edit]
There's not even enough for a section in LessWrong, certainly not for a standalone article - David Gerard (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Related -- do we really need a navbox for a single blog? Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 16:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Don't really care either way about the nav template; most of the articles in the category are of decent length. But this stub should be deleted, as should "the Sequences" (done). ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 16:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. Yes they should. Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 16:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Don't really care either way about the nav template; most of the articles in the category are of decent length. But this stub should be deleted, as should "the Sequences" (done). ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐ
- Why is it terrible? And why did the entry on the sequences get removed?--Baloney Detection (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I just said why it is: there's no reason for this article to exist. There's about enough substance for a parenthesised aside in the main article - David Gerard (talk) 23:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
