Talk:Thomas

Love it. Bondurant 11:51, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Dump it.

Delete

I motion to delete this "fork". Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:57, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

This "fork" has no purpose. What vaguely sensible person, for anything other than lulz, would search for "Thomas"—not Clarence Thomas, no Thomas Jefferson, just Thomas. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:57, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Please describe for me how this fork is any different from all the retarded redirects that Conservapedia insists on having. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:57, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

I second the motion to delete. I also move to delete the ridiculopolous category "railroad woo". ħuman 00:30, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Eheh, I already did. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:37, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't forget to delete wherever Messr. Skwirrel added it... Ayn Rand, and maybe one other place? Choochoo! ħuman 00:56, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't worry, that was the first thing I took care of. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:40, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't forget to delete the goat articles while you're at it. And somebody needs to send long-eared jerboa into oblivion too. Secret Squirrel 22:01, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Secret Squirrel, those are all established in-jokes. "Railroad woo" is not. And automotive woo is a legitimate category with a lame name. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:23, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

And here I thought I was the only one deleting that category (and banning the lame-ass guy last night) and having SS undo whatever I did... --Kels 22:25, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

RationalWiki: A team effort. Or, two teams' efforts. Or twelve, or thirteen. Hell, every beachrat for themselves! ħuman 22:34, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

In-jokes are elitist, stupid, systemically discriminatory against people with Aspergers, usually incoherent, and elitist. Did I mention elitist? Secret Squirrel 22:35, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Not elitist - just survived the test of time. ħuman 23:04, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

I have Asperger's, and I love our in-jokes. But it's true they are elitist.

Now you heard the man. Stop making goat jokes this instant! PURGE THE SITE OF GOATS! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:05, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

The goat is dead! Long live the goat! ħuman 23:09, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Self-diagnosed (which is usually what most of them are) Aspies usually love in-jokes as long as they're their own. Maybe I should have said they are inherently discriminatory against people without Aspergers. And still elitist. Secret Squirrel 23:12, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

So can I be one? Or three? ħuman 23:15, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

You're whatever you want to be. What you say is what you get. Secret Squirrel 23:26, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Then I am one, and I speak for all of us!!! ħuman 23:55, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

"Self-diagnosed"? The only reason you would say would be if you think I'm one those "self-diagnosed". Which I am, if by "self-diagnosed" you mean, "My mother took me to the Child Development and Rehabilitation Center, where, after much testing, they told my horrified mother 'He has Asperger's Syndrome'." That kind of self-diagnosed? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:40, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

I have Asperjism!!! I iz one Aspie. Pleez 2 not offend Me! Evah. ħuman 00:49, 12 September 2008 (EDT)