Talk:Tony Blair
|
This British politics related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information. |
| ||
|
| ||||
|
This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. |
London Assembly[edit]
"London Assembly - since the UK was already one of the most overcentralised states in Europe, giving London more power and money seems a mixed blessing. On the other hand, London had had no city-wide governance since the Greater London Council was abolished in 1986."
Why exactly this can't be in the "Like" section? --109.155.108.87 (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Teeth[edit]
TB was on the air earlier this week.
His teeth were #incredibly# discoloured (especially given that he has the money to get them fixed). 86.191.125.187 (talk) 09:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Tony needs braces[edit]
Dental plan! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Gender Recognition Act[edit]
I have thought of this for a few days I always found Blair's transphobia Ironic given that his government enacted the GRA in the first place. But I asked Philosophy Tube about it the other day and she said that Blair had to be forced to pass it by the european court of human rights https://twitter.com/PhilosophyTube/status/1683391574430941187 That makes it less ironic and more unsuprising and I think that should be mentioned on the page as i think it fits the site's mission. (talk) 11:02 pm 30 July 2023 (AEST)
Comeback?[edit]
I think this needs updating as he has had a comeback through puppetering Keir Starmer & influincing his descisions. He was party pariah for a while but now unfortunatly it's the left that have his spot now. Which I wouldn't mind if the blarites gave a shit about trans people but they are anti woke fatheads and anti trans bigots so here we are anyway i think this bit needs updating — Unsigned, by: Yacob01 / talk / contribs
Law change[edit]
@YISUN didn't the 2003 Act specifically make it so women couldn't be found guilty of rape? Chillpilled (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
It introduced the offence of "engaging in sexual activity without consent", which is identical to rape in every way, including sentencing, but can be committed by a woman; previously there had been no offence equivalent to rape that a woman could be found guilty of, only lesser offences like SA. I put "rape" because it was simpler than explaining the full legal difference.--YISUN (talk) 09:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)