There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Tooth Fairy Project
link at footnote 5 is broken- http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/nuclear-facilities ,
this one will do- http://dceg.cancer.gov/about/organization/programs-ebp/reb/fact-sheet-mortality-risk .
cancer near nuclear facilities in the US was conducted by the National Cancer Institute and completed in 1991[edit]
Which study says this??
"No Excess Mortality Risk Found in Counties with Nuclear..." doesn't seem to nor does Jablon 1991
The UK study does say so, but I don't see anything about the US.
- Oops I see it now. US study says it dropped after the facilities started operating. UK study says it drops in vicinity of facilities. I'll try to clarify. Hmmph (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Can one say[edit]
That this project is 'away with the fairies'? Anna Livia (talk) 10:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)