2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Talk:Trilateral Commission

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon conspiracy.svg

This Conspiracy theories related article has been assessed as SIGNIFICANTLY PROBLEMATIC in one or more ways. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Jellybrain.png
[hide]This article requires attention for the following reason(s):
  • Needs more sources.
  • Needs expansion on some points.

Incompleteness[edit]

Not that this isn't well written, but is this really the only information we have on these guys? I mean, do we have any idea of what their "real" discussions look like, such as an example of an actual meeting?

I mean, if we don't, fine. I'm just curious. --Wolvenreign (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Why Is This Contradictory To The Noam Chomsky Article[edit]

I've noticed that both the Noam Chomsky and Trilateral Commission article contradict each other on the basis that in the Noam Chomsky article he regards it of not much importance while in this article it says he thinks it's evil. If this article is wrong, change it to someone more appropriateBoredsocialist (talk)