2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $6477.98Goal: $10000

Talk:Vagina

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This isn't a good redirect. Anywhere else it could go instead? WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Delete and delink? And then protect from creation? G spot? Human sexuality? --ZooGuard (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Another option would be creating a single article on the female genitals, merging content from the stub articles clitoris, G spot, yoni & cunnilingus together & redirecting from other related terms like vagina. Cunt should remain separate as it's largely about the word rather than the bodily organ. WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
those seem to me like largely different things. I rather agree with Zoo to remove the redirect. Some of the articles on g spot, yoni etc, really get into woo and are worthy articles on their own. And some, I'm not even sure why we have...Green mowse.pngGodot The ablity to breath is such an overrated ability 20:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)